IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chongmin Lee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-10 Country: South Korea
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0482 0.0518 0.1821 0.1958
2017-18 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 47 7 12 19 0.404 0.1558 0.1600 0.5891 0.6050
2018-19 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 55 6 12 18 0.327 0.1261 0.1227 0.4769 0.4641
2019-20 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 24 8 16 24 1.000 0.3853 0.3853 1.4571 1.4571
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22105
Forward overall
#1092
Forward born in 1999
#1137
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Coleman
Manhattanville · 2010-11
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Lamirande
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Isley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.