IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Elan Bar-Lev-Wise Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Vernon Vipers BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Vernon Vipers BCHL 58 7 19 26 0.448 0.1670 0.1770 0.6532 0.6922
2019-20 — BCHL 49 5 14 19 0.388 0.1445 0.1445 0.5651 0.5651
2020-21 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 11 2 3 5 0.455 0.1693 0.1693 0.6623 0.6623
2021-22 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 54 23 30 53 0.982 0.3656 0.3324 1.4301 1.3001
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC SR 11 1 0 1 0.091
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC JR 25 1 1 2 0.080
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC SO 28 1 2 3 0.107
2022-23 Yale D1 ECAC FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20800
Forward overall
#992
Forward born in 2001
#1150
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kailin Chen
UMass Dartmouth · 2024-25
1.454 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Kolb
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Yim
Adrian · 2014-15
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.