← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Guiney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 46 1 11 12 0.261 0.1015 0.1036 0.3805 0.3882
2018-19 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 56 5 21 26 0.464 0.1807 0.1746 0.6771 0.6543
2019-20 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 55 18 38 56 1.018 0.2942 0.2942 0.7665 0.7665
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 19 2 5 7 0.368
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 26 1 1 2 0.077
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC 25 6 9 15 0.600
2021-22 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SO 25 6 11 17 0.680
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC 21 2 9 11 0.524
2020-21 Concordia Wisconsin D3 FR 21 2 9 11 0.524
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2020-21 · Concordia
+318.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18471
Forward overall
#701
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trine · 2017-18
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2015-16
0.581 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.