← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Munro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-02-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Merritt Centennials BCHL 53 3 18 21 0.396 0.1527 0.1626 0.5766 0.6141
2018-19 Merritt Centennials BCHL 44 3 15 18 0.409 0.1576 0.1593 0.5954 0.6019
2019-20 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 47 6 20 26 0.553 0.2131 0.2131 0.8051 0.8051
2020-21 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 20 4 8 12 0.600 0.2312 0.2312 0.8732 0.8732
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC JR 18 2 4 6 0.333
2022-23 Brown D1 ECAC SO 20 1 8 9 0.450
2021-22 Brown D1 ECAC FR 16 1 3 4 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2021-22 · Brown
+64.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6777
Defenseman overall
#1380
Defenseman born in 2000
#1532
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2008-09
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.