IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Bourhas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Nepean Raiders CCHL 37 8 12 20 0.540 0.1543 0.1511 0.4184 0.4096
2018-19 — CCHL 62 16 37 53 0.855 0.2440 0.2281 0.6617 0.6184
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Colby D3 NESCAC SR 26 5 11 16 0.615
2021-22 Colby D3 NESCAC JR 23 6 2 8 0.348
2020-21 Colby D3 NESCAC SO 4 1 3 4 1.000
2019-20 Colby D3 NESCAC FR 24 5 5 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2019-20 · Colby
+146.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22226
Forward overall
#876
Forward born in 1998
#694
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Keaney
Neumann · 2008-09
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ron Lindgren
Aurora · 2013-14
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Wiesner
Babson · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.