IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Fraser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — CCHL 32 3 5 8 0.250 0.0542 0.0525 0.1935 0.1874
2018-19 Kemptville 73's CCHL 51 2 6 8 0.157 0.0340 0.0314 0.1215 0.1123
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Nichols D3 CNE SR 24 9 4 13 0.542
2021-22 Nichols D3 CNE JR 17 1 3 4 0.235
2020-21 Nichols D1 — SO 3 1 0 1 0.333
2020-21 Nichols D3 CNE SO 3 1 0 1 0.333
2019-20 Nichols D1 — FR 27 5 6 11 0.407
2019-20 Nichols D3 CNE FR 27 5 6 11 0.407
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2019-20 · Nichols
+983.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23174
Defenseman overall
#3030
Defenseman born in 1998
#1786
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Cayemberg
Wisconsin-Stout · 2012-13
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Campbell
Salem State · 2013-14
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Fuss
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.