← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Dow-Kenny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-10-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Vernon Vipers BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 — BCHL 47 1 8 9 0.192 0.0738 0.0773 0.2785 0.2916
2019-20 Langley Rivermen BCHL 54 3 10 13 0.241 0.0927 0.0927 0.3501 0.3501
2020-21 Coquitlam Express BCHL 20 3 8 11 0.550 0.2119 0.2119 0.7999 0.7999
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 27 2 6 8 0.296
2023-24 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 28 3 12 15 0.536
2022-23 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 27 1 5 6 0.222
2021-22 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 26 4 13 17 0.654
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2021-22 · Skidmore
+795.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12305
Defenseman overall
#2146
Defenseman born in 2000
#2305
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2017-18
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2022-23
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.