← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hollander Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Langley Rivermen BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Aurora Tigers OJHL 19 4 0 4 0.210 0.0516 0.0552 0.1449 0.1551
2020-21 Aurora Tigers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Aurora Tigers OJHL 53 12 18 30 0.566 0.1387 0.1282 0.3897 0.3603
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 19 23 42 1.235
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 19 23 42 1.235
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 19 23 42 1.235
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 19 23 42 1.235
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 19 23 42 1.235
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 19 23 42 1.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.24
2020-21 · Ohio University
+2511.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41548
Forward overall
#2328
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

King's · 2023-24
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2024-25
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2006-07
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.