← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Hodge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 BCHL 53 10 15 25 0.472 0.1817 0.1864 0.6865 0.7043
2019-20 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 58 30 27 57 0.983 0.3296 0.3296 0.9095 0.9095
2020-21 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 16 10 19 29 1.812 0.6079 0.6079 1.6773 1.6773
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA 25 3 1 4 0.160
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 AHA 33 0 4 4 0.121
2022-23 Union D1 ECAC 2 1 0 1 0.500
2021-22 Union D1 ECAC 34 5 5 10 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2021-22 · Union
+84.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8521
Forward overall
#363
Forward born in 2000
#78
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2020-21
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2019-20
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.