← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Loheit Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-07-26 Country: USA
2018 NHL Draft Round 7, Pick #194  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Penticton Vees BCHL 43 8 16 24 0.558 0.2079 0.2149 0.8132 0.8406
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen GR 36 10 10 20 0.556
2023-24 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 36 10 10 20 0.556
2022-23 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 35 8 11 19 0.543
2022-23 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 35 8 11 19 0.543
2021-22 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 34 2 4 6 0.176
2021-22 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 34 2 4 6 0.176
2020-21 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC SO 28 3 2 5 0.179
2019-20 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC FR 33 5 1 6 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2019-20 · Minnesota Duluth
-1.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26981
Forward overall
#1294
Forward born in 2000
#1642
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.26 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2002-03
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John's · 2003-04
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2020-21
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.