IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Loheit Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-07-26 Country: USA
2018 · Round 7, Pick #194  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Penticton Vees BCHL 43 8 16 24 0.558 0.2150 0.2223 0.8122 0.8396
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC — 36 10 10 20 0.556
2022-23 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC — 35 8 11 19 0.543
2021-22 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC — 34 2 4 6 0.176
2020-21 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC SO 28 3 2 5 0.179
2019-20 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC FR 33 5 1 6 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2019-20 · Minnesota Duluth
-4.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27186
Forward overall
#1329
Forward born in 2000
#1465
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mac Lowry
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.062 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lee Swallow
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2002-03
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Eagles
Saint John's · 2003-04
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.