IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dan McIntyre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-11-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 7 2 1 3 0.429 0.0930 0.1065 0.3316 0.3799
2017-18 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 54 4 6 10 0.185 0.0402 0.0440 0.1433 0.1568
2018-19 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 54 5 8 13 0.241 0.0927 0.0973 0.3503 0.3678
2019-20 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 36 8 13 21 0.583 0.2247 0.2247 0.8489 0.8489
2020-21 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 18 6 4 10 0.556 0.1863 0.1863 0.5142 0.5142
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Cornell D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32751
Forward overall
#1673
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Burr
University of New England · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Leone
Utica · 2005-06
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Dawson
Nazareth · 2009-10
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.