← New Search ↗ Social Card

Deepkaran Hans Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Powell River Kings BCHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0771 0.0858 0.2914 0.3242
2021-22 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 22 2 14 16 0.727 0.1400 0.1354 0.4583 0.4434
2022-23 Dauphin Kings MJHL 41 13 12 25 0.610 0.1174 0.1081 0.3843 0.3538
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Marian D3 NCHA GR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Marian D3 NCHA SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Marian D3 NCHA JR 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2023-24 · Marian
+63.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31484
Forward overall
#1858
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2006-07
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2007-08
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.