← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Tattle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Coquitlam Express BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Coquitlam Express BCHL 20 3 11 14 0.700 0.2697 0.2697 1.0200 1.0200
2020-21 Coquitlam Express BCHL 18 9 9 18 1.000 0.3853 0.3853 1.4571 1.4571
2021-22 Coquitlam Express BCHL 52 23 37 60 1.154 0.4446 0.4175 1.6812 1.5786
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UConn D1 HockeyEast SR 38 13 19 32 0.842
2024-25 UConn D1 HockeyEast 39 18 14 32 0.821
2023-24 UConn D1 HockeyEast 34 4 8 12 0.353
2022-23 UConn D1 HockeyEast 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · UConn
-78.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10204
Forward overall
#435
Forward born in 2001
#310
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.