← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Sansbury Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-10-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 31 4 11 15 0.484 0.0959 0.0959 0.2205 0.2205
2019-20 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 54 3 21 24 0.444 0.1712 0.1712 0.6467 0.6467
2020-21 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 20 2 11 13 0.650 0.2504 0.2504 0.9459 0.9459
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 39 6 15 21 0.538
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 36 5 10 15 0.417
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 37 7 11 18 0.486
2021-22 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 36 0 10 10 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2021-22 · Sacred Heart
+207.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7210
Defenseman overall
#1452
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2008-09
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2018-19
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.