← New Search ↗ Social Card

Xavier Henry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 48 4 14 18 0.375 0.1397 0.1397 0.5464 0.5464
2020-21 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.1242 0.1242 0.4857 0.4857
2021-22 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 51 8 17 25 0.490 0.1826 0.1672 0.7143 0.6540
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 7 0 1 1 0.143
2024-25 Vermont D1 HockeyEast 26 4 6 10 0.385
2023-24 Vermont D1 HockeyEast 22 1 1 2 0.091
2022-23 Vermont D1 HockeyEast 18 0 1 1 0.056
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2022-23 · Vermont
-64.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9258
Defenseman overall
#1845
Defenseman born in 2001
#2174
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.