← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon Tassy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 51 10 7 17 0.333 0.1284 0.1284 0.4851 0.4851
2020-21 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 20 18 9 27 1.350 0.5202 0.5202 1.9647 1.9647
2021-22 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 53 38 40 78 1.472 0.5670 0.5192 2.1418 1.9613
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 39 14 9 23 0.590
2024-25 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 31 6 5 11 0.355
2023-24 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 40 12 16 28 0.700
2022-23 Minnesota D1 BigTen 15 1 4 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Minnesota
-31.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7727
Forward overall
#327
Forward born in 2001
#127
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.