IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian MacDougall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Coquitlam Express BCHL 42 4 6 10 0.238 0.0887 0.0887 0.3469 0.3469
2020-21 Coquitlam Express BCHL 16 6 4 10 0.625 0.2328 0.2328 0.9107 0.9107
2021-22 Coquitlam Express BCHL 40 10 8 18 0.450 0.1676 0.1533 0.6557 0.5997
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA SR 9 0 1 1 0.111
2024-25 Canisius D1 AHA JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Canisius D1 AHA SO 7 1 0 1 0.143
2022-23 Canisius D1 AHA FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33103
Forward overall
#1774
Forward born in 2001
#2099
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Berglund
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Lopez
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Fea
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.