← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Glen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Vernon Vipers BCHL 41 2 6 8 0.195 0.0752 0.0752 0.2839 0.2839
2020-21 Vernon Vipers BCHL 20 3 3 6 0.300 0.1156 0.1156 0.4366 0.4366
2021-22 Vernon Vipers BCHL 31 5 4 9 0.290 0.1119 0.1056 0.4225 0.3987
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 7 23 30 0.882
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 7 23 30 0.882
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 7 23 30 0.882
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 7 23 30 0.882
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 7 23 30 0.882
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 7 23 30 0.882
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2020-21 · Ohio University
+1270.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46612
Forward overall
#2729
Forward born in 2001
#2643
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2025-26
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wesleyan · 2010-11
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.