IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abram Wiebe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-08-28 Country: Canada
2022 NHL Draft Round 7, Pick #209  ·  Vegas Golden Knights Vegas Golden Knights
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 — BCHL 20 3 8 11 0.550 0.2049 0.2049 0.8014 0.8014
2021-22 — BCHL 54 2 29 31 0.574 0.2139 0.2219 0.8365 0.8679
2022-23 — BCHL 54 12 41 53 0.982 0.3656 0.3614 1.4301 1.4137
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 40 5 24 29 0.725
2024-25 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 38 4 20 24 0.632
2023-24 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 40 1 9 10 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2023-24 · North Dakota
-13.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Billings
Salve Regina · 2014-15
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Cook
Nichols · 2011-12
1.185 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conlan Keenan
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.