← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marcus Joughin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampton NE-Prep 35 11 28 39 1.114 0.2207 0.2207 0.5077 0.5077
2019-20 New Hampton NE-Prep 35 16 63 79 2.257 0.4471 0.4471 1.0283 1.0283
2020-21 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 15 6 17 23 1.533 0.5908 0.5908 2.2314 2.2314
2021-22 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 49 8 39 47 0.959 0.3696 0.3438 1.3959 1.2985
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 40 8 26 34 0.850
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 39 3 18 21 0.538
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 34 8 13 21 0.618
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 35 8 16 24 0.686
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2022-23 · Sacred Heart
+108.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5997
Forward overall
#237
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.