← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marcus Joughin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampton NE-Prep 35 11 28 39 1.114 0.3143 0.3143 0.5099 0.5099
2019-20 New Hampton NE-Prep 35 16 63 79 2.257 0.6367 0.6367 1.0328 1.0328
2020-21 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 15 6 17 23 1.533 0.5712 0.5712 2.2342 2.2342
2021-22 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 49 8 39 47 0.959 0.3573 0.3324 1.3977 1.3002
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 40 8 26 34 0.850
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 39 3 18 21 0.538
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 34 8 13 21 0.618
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 35 8 16 24 0.686
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2022-23 · Sacred Heart
+76.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5731
Forward overall
#217
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2007-08
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.