IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devon de Vries Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 19 7 10 17 0.895 0.3447 0.3447 1.3021 1.3021
2021-22 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 51 7 13 20 0.392 0.1511 0.1452 0.5708 0.5486
2022-23 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 54 7 16 23 0.426 0.1641 0.1497 0.6198 0.5654
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamilton D3 NESCAC GR 30 6 25 31 1.033
2024-25 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 29 8 16 24 0.828
2023-24 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 26 8 10 18 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2023-24 · Hamilton
+446.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29283
Forward overall
#1713
Forward born in 2002
#1599
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carson Kelley
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivan Galaguzov
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Luiten
Neumann · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.