← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reece Henry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Portage Terriers MJHL 59 15 27 42 0.712 0.1370 0.1402 0.4489 0.4595
2019-20 Portage Terriers MJHL 55 13 13 26 0.473 0.0910 0.0910 0.2981 0.2981
2020-21 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 20 1 3 4 0.200 0.0771 0.0771 0.2911 0.2911
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minot State University ACHA_D1 26 5 8 13 0.500
2024-25 Minot State University ACHA_D1 26 5 8 13 0.500
2023-24 Minot State University ACHA_D1 26 5 8 13 0.500
2022-23 Minot State University ACHA_D1 26 5 8 13 0.500
2021-22 Minot State University ACHA_D1 26 5 8 13 0.500
2020-21 Minot State University ACHA_D1 26 5 8 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2020-21 · Minot State University
+316.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42945
Forward overall
#2382
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2021-22
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.