← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Wong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-12-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Merritt Centennials BCHL 27 1 2 3 0.111 0.0428 0.0451 0.1616 0.1701
2023-24 Merritt Centennials BCHL 36 3 1 4 0.111 0.0428 0.0431 0.1616 0.1627
2024-25 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 48 1 15 16 0.333 0.1284 0.1228 0.4848 0.4637
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Lindenwood D1 CCHA SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 CCHA FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20881
Defenseman overall
#3587
Defenseman born in 2004
#3010
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keene State · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.