IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jayden Sison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Coquitlam Express BCHL 50 14 21 35 0.700 0.2607 0.2629 1.0200 1.0285
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 32 2 6 8 0.250
2024-25 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2023-24 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 30 0 4 4 0.133
2022-23 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 30 2 6 8 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2022-23 · Princeton
+18.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19830
Forward overall
#1025
Forward born in 2003
#1056
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2021-22
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Master
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buster Larsson
Utica · 2017-18
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.