← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Pfoh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-18 Country: Canada
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 43 11 21 32 0.744 0.2867 0.3245 1.0830 1.2260
2022-23 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 45 8 9 17 0.378 0.1456 0.1577 0.5498 0.5954
2023-24 BCHL 56 14 19 33 0.589 0.2271 0.2355 0.8576 0.8895
2024-25 Langley Rivermen BCHL 22 10 5 15 0.682 0.2627 0.2593 0.9922 0.9792
2025-26 Coquitlam Express BCHL 48 10 32 42 0.875 0.3371 0.3203 1.2734 1.2099
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18181
Forward overall
#968
Forward born in 2005
#815
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2022-23
0.31
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
NAHL 2013-14
0.38
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
CCHL 2014-15
0.63
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
NAHL 2023-24
0.21
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.