← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bauer Morrissey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Millbrook NE-Prep 32 10 19 29 0.906 0.1748 0.1748 0.4147 0.4147
2020-21 Millbrook NE-Prep 2 2 1 3 1.500 0.2893 0.2893 0.6864 0.6864
2021-22 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 46 5 17 22 0.478 0.1843 0.1764 0.6969 0.6671
2022-23 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 54 9 28 37 0.685 0.2640 0.2398 0.9984 0.9069
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC GR 31 7 17 24 0.774
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 31 3 20 23 0.742
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 27 5 22 27 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2023-24 · Hobart
+394.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5077
Defenseman overall
#1309
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.