IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Morin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 52 5 9 14 0.269 0.1037 0.1106 0.3918 0.4179
2022-23 — BCHL 54 10 13 23 0.426 0.1641 0.1670 0.6198 0.6308
2023-24 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 52 17 17 34 0.654 0.2519 0.2448 0.9515 0.9247
2024-25 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 53 17 30 47 0.887 0.3417 0.3149 1.2906 1.1894
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 29 9 6 15 0.517
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2025-26 · Dartmouth
+110.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19821
Forward overall
#1040
Forward born in 2004
#934
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robbie Murden
Hamilton · 2012-13
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Yann Poirier
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.030 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Bommarito
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.