IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua Schenk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 47 3 6 9 0.192 0.0713 0.0776 0.2790 0.3037
2022-23 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 48 16 10 26 0.542 0.2018 0.2098 0.7893 0.8205
2023-24 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 47 12 20 32 0.681 0.2536 0.2520 0.9921 0.9859
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 27 4 3 7 0.259
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC — 19 0 2 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2024-25 · Dartmouth
-47.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28833
Forward overall
#1695
Forward born in 2004
#1779
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Soik
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2005-06
1.346 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.