IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Desilets Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 31 2 6 8 0.258 0.0994 0.1053 0.3756 0.3979
2022-23 — BCHL 47 2 17 19 0.404 0.1558 0.1574 0.5884 0.5945
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Dartmouth D1 ECAC — 22 0 4 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2023-24 · Dartmouth
+41.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13190
Defenseman overall
#2659
Defenseman born in 2004
#2315
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Sleep
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Dawes
Utica · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Fish
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2003-04
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.