← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Pascucci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 31 3 16 19 0.613 0.3418 0.3418 0.4956 0.4956
2021-22 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 55 1 8 9 0.164 0.1006 0.0947 0.4820 0.4539
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA SR 35 0 6 6 0.171
2024-25 UConn D1 HockeyEast 10 0 1 1 0.100
2023-24 UConn D1 HockeyEast 24 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 UConn D1 HockeyEast 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6660
Defenseman overall
#1634
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.