← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-10-25 Country: Canada
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Coquitlam Express BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1926 0.2112 0.7277 0.7979
2023-24 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 39 0 6 6 0.154 0.0593 0.0623 0.2238 0.2351
2024-25 Coquitlam Express BCHL 53 2 16 18 0.340 0.1308 0.1309 0.4942 0.4944
2025-26 Coquitlam Express BCHL 47 5 16 21 0.447 0.1722 0.1659 0.6502 0.6266
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13101
Defenseman overall
#2607
Defenseman born in 2005
#2304
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2012-13
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
NAHL 2023-24
0.06
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
CCHL 2016-17
0.45
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
USHL 2022-23
0.35
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.387 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2016-17
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.