← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ivan Korodiuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-05 Country: Ukraine
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 47 1 8 9 0.192 0.0759 0.0780 0.2011 0.2067
2023-24 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 60 3 22 25 0.417 0.1651 0.1618 0.4375 0.4287
2024-25 Madison Capitols USHL 19 1 7 8 0.421 0.2589 0.2287 1.2406 1.0960
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SO 30 1 3 4 0.133
2024-25 Bowling Green D1 CCHA 17 0 1 1 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2024-25 · Bowling Green
-51.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7444
Defenseman overall
#1786
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2010-11
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2024-25
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.