IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaac Tremblay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Vernon Vipers BCHL 53 9 15 24 0.453 0.1687 0.1758 0.6598 0.6877
2023-24 Vernon Vipers BCHL 51 23 16 39 0.765 0.2849 0.2839 1.1142 1.1103
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 33 8 8 16 0.485
2024-25 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC — 33 4 8 12 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2024-25 · St. Lawrence
+76.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22808
Forward overall
#1258
Forward born in 2004
#1315
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Aucoin
Southern Maine · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean David
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2012-13
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.