← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Buckley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Georges NE-Prep 30 3 5 8 0.267 0.0528 0.0528 0.1215 0.1215
2019-20 St. Georges NE-Prep 22 1 2 3 0.136 0.0270 0.0270 0.0621 0.0621
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 St. Georges NE-Prep 25 1 12 13 0.520 0.1030 0.1030 0.2369 0.2369
2022-23 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 41 0 2 2 0.049 0.0188 0.0189 0.0710 0.0715
2023-24 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 49 2 6 8 0.163 0.0629 0.0604 0.2377 0.2283
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2024-25 · Holy Cross
+72.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22763
Defenseman overall
#3772
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2022-23
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2014-15
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.