IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aleksy Bandu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Governors Academy NE-Prep 28 3 3 6 0.214 0.0425 0.0425 0.0976 0.0976
2022-23 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 25 1 4 5 0.200 0.0434 0.0447 0.1547 0.1594
2023-24 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 46 2 12 14 0.304 0.0660 0.0645 0.2354 0.2300
2024-25 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 54 8 15 23 0.426 0.0924 0.0861 0.3295 0.3070
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC FR 20 2 0 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2025-26 · Albertus Magnus
+36.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18315
Defenseman overall
#3314
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Anderson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Beckstead
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David Cohen
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.