IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Johnstone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-26 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Brock Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Pickering Panthers OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Pickering Panthers OJHL 44 13 24 37 0.841 0.2061 0.2128 0.5790 0.5978
2023-24 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 34 8 9 17 0.500 0.1677 0.1661 0.4627 0.4583
2024-25 Spruce Grove Saints BCHL 52 14 18 32 0.615 0.2371 0.2234 0.8956 0.8439
2025-26 Brock Univ. USports-M 19 4 7 11 0.579 0.3054 0.3322 1.6968 1.8458
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19838
Forward overall
#1043
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Schultz
St. Norbert · 2001-02
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hill
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2010-11
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Padgeon
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.