← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Bernard-Docker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0664 0.0757 0.1854 0.2114
2018-19 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 56 3 18 21 0.375 0.1244 0.1358 0.3475 0.3794
2019-20 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 54 5 27 32 0.593 0.1966 0.1966 0.5492 0.5492
2020-21 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 7 0 3 3 0.429 0.1422 0.1422 0.3972 0.3972
2021-22 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 29 1 3 4 0.138 0.0848 0.0786 0.4063 0.3766
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bentley D1 AHA SR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Bentley D1 AHA JR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Bentley D1 AHA SO 16 0 6 6 0.375
2022-23 Bentley D1 AHA FR 20 1 6 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · Bentley
+265.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12921
Defenseman overall
#2269
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2001-02
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2008-09
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.