← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Bernard-Docker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0671 0.0765 0.1851 0.2111
2018-19 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 56 3 18 21 0.375 0.1258 0.1374 0.3470 0.3789
2019-20 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 54 5 27 32 0.593 0.1988 0.1988 0.5484 0.5484
2020-21 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 7 0 3 3 0.429 0.1438 0.1438 0.3966 0.3966
2021-22 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 29 1 3 4 0.138 0.0813 0.0754 0.4142 0.3839
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bentley D1 AHA SR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Bentley D1 AHA JR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Bentley D1 AHA SO 16 0 6 6 0.375
2022-23 Bentley D1 AHA FR 20 1 6 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · Bentley
+270.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13086
Defenseman overall
#2285
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2017-18
1.053 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.