← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cash Carter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-09-07 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Minnesota State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 42 7 14 21 0.500 0.1926 0.2010 0.7277 0.7596
2025-26 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 53 26 26 52 0.981 0.3780 0.3807 1.4278 1.4379
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16866
Forward overall
#696
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2012-13
0.74
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
NAHL 2014-15
0.92
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHL 2015-16
0.97
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.25
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2016-17
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.