← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Good Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-31 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Brooks Bandits BCHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0963 0.1033 0.3638 0.3901
2024-25 Brooks Bandits BCHL 45 5 10 15 0.333 0.1284 0.1312 0.4851 0.4957
2025-26 Brooks Bandits BCHL 54 22 48 70 1.296 0.4995 0.4921 1.8865 1.8585
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13192
Forward overall
#506
Forward born in 2006
#457
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NCDC 2017-18
0.27
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
USHL 2018-19
0.39
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
AJHL 2022-23
0.33
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
USHL 2024-25
0.27
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2009-10
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2010-11
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2007-08
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.