← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Good Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-31 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Brooks Bandits BCHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0963 0.1033 0.3636 0.3899
2024-25 Brooks Bandits BCHL 45 5 10 15 0.333 0.1284 0.1312 0.4848 0.4954
2025-26 Brooks Bandits BCHL 54 22 48 70 1.296 0.4995 0.4921 1.8853 1.8573
2026-27 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.1928 0.1928 0.8727 0.8727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13418
Forward overall
#524
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.47
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.36
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.11
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
AJHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2024-25
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.