IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hudson Wiles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-05-11 Country: Canada
Colgate
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 23 0 1 1 0.043 0.0168 0.0189 0.0633 0.0714
2024-25 Collingwood Blues OJHL 26 2 11 13 0.500 0.1226 0.1305 0.3443 0.3664
2025-26 Collingwood Blues OJHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0613 0.0619 0.1721 0.1738
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8620
Defenseman overall
#1194
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Colgate Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Bobby Metz
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.06
actual FR PPG at Colgate
Anthony Stark
NAHL 2017-18
0.12
actual FR PPG at Colgate
Kevin McNamara
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.40
actual FR PPG at Colgate
Kenny Citron
BCHL 2013-14
0.14
actual FR PPG at Colgate

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Buha
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Vince
SUNY Morrisville · 2007-08
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Philip Björkman
Nichols · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.