| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Salisbury School | NE-Prep | 29 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.103 | 0.0292 | 0.0292 | 0.0473 | 0.0473 |
| 2019-20 | Salisbury School | NE-Prep | 28 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.286 | 0.0806 | 0.0806 | 0.1307 | 0.1307 |
| 2020-21 | — | NAHL | 62 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.226 | 0.0895 | 0.0895 | 0.2371 | 0.2371 |
| 2021-22 | Minnesota Wilderness | NAHL | 55 | 11 | 23 | 34 | 0.618 | 0.2449 | 0.2346 | 0.6490 | 0.6218 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | SR | 30 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.167 |
| 2024-25 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | JR | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.100 |
| 2023-24 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | SO | 36 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.111 |
| 2022-23 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | FR | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.062 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.