← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bobby Metz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Salisbury School NE-Prep 29 1 2 3 0.103 0.0292 0.0292 0.0473 0.0473
2019-20 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 1 7 8 0.286 0.0806 0.0806 0.1307 0.1307
2020-21 NAHL 62 6 8 14 0.226 0.0895 0.0895 0.2371 0.2371
2021-22 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 55 11 23 34 0.618 0.2449 0.2346 0.6490 0.6218
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 30 4 1 5 0.167
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 36 2 2 4 0.111
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 16 0 1 1 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2022-23 · Colgate
-61.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9850
Defenseman overall
#1912
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Babson · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2013-14
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.