← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack McAra Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-13 Country: Canada
RIT
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Burlington Cougars OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 51 10 25 35 0.686 0.2302 0.2401 0.6351 0.6623
2024-25 BCHL 51 6 22 28 0.549 0.2115 0.2104 0.7990 0.7947
2025-26 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 47 24 37 61 1.298 0.5001 0.4791 1.8888 1.8093
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13104
Forward overall
#647
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

RIT Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

OJHL 2022-23
0.72
actual FR PPG at RIT
NAHL 2016-17
0.12
actual FR PPG at RIT
BCHL 2023-24
0.10
actual FR PPG at RIT
BCHL 2024-25
0.42
actual FR PPG at RIT

D2/3 Comparables

Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2006-07
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.