IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Hunter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Chicago Steel USHL 27 1 2 3 0.111 0.0655 0.0699 0.3273 0.3493
2022-23 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 57 13 26 39 0.684 0.2430 0.2573 0.7183 0.7606
2023-24 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 56 19 34 53 0.946 0.3362 0.3400 0.9936 1.0047
2024-25 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 53 11 20 31 0.585 0.2078 0.1992 0.6141 0.5887
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16985
Forward overall
#844
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Musella Jr.
Stevenson · 2021-22
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Niko Benjamin
Norwich · 2024-25
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Prescott
Nichols · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.