IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Meredith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-01 Country: USA
Adrian
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Okotoks Oilers BCHL 48 8 5 13 0.271 0.1043 0.1031 0.3941 0.3897
2025-26 Okotoks Oilers BCHL 51 12 21 33 0.647 0.2493 0.2373 0.9417 0.8965
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31045
Forward overall
#1847
Forward born in 2005
#1724
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Adrian Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Zach Heintz
1.18
actual FR PPG at Adrian
Vincent Paquette
1.00
actual FR PPG at Adrian
Trevor Boyd
1.04
actual FR PPG at Adrian
Lukas Ciotti
0.78
actual FR PPG at Adrian

D2/3 Comparables

Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Romano
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Storjohann
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.