← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Gramer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-14 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Moorhead USHS-MN 22 2 11 13 0.591 0.1591 0.1591 0.1435 0.1435
2021-22 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 56 1 4 5 0.089 0.0549 0.0582 0.2631 0.2789
2023-24 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 62 1 10 11 0.177 0.1090 0.1102 0.5227 0.5282
2025-26 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 29 1 14 15 0.517 0.2516 0.2286 1.2673 1.1516
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 13 0 1 1 0.077
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 33 0 4 4 0.121
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2024-25 · Nebraska Omaha
+43.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9551
Defenseman overall
#2098
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2013-14
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.