← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 25 7 7 14 0.560 0.0709 0.0709 0.1360 0.1360
2020-21 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 17 4 12 16 0.941 0.1192 0.1192 0.2286 0.2286
2021-22 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 11 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 56 4 12 16 0.286 0.1685 0.1620 0.8581 0.8252
2023-24 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 61 3 23 26 0.426 0.2514 0.2293 1.2800 1.1674
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA SO 37 7 13 20 0.540
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA 33 3 10 13 0.394
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2024-25 · Augustana
+106.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8571
Defenseman overall
#1945
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2015-16
1.273 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.