← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 25 7 7 14 0.560 0.1508 0.1508 0.1360 0.1360
2020-21 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 17 4 12 16 0.941 0.2534 0.2534 0.2286 0.2286
2021-22 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 11 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 56 4 12 16 0.286 0.1756 0.1689 0.8417 0.8094
2023-24 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 61 3 23 26 0.426 0.2620 0.2389 1.2557 1.1452
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA SO 37 7 13 20 0.540
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA 33 3 10 13 0.394
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2024-25 · Augustana
+97.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8382
Defenseman overall
#1930
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2013-14
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.