IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lee Jubinville Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-04-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 60 26 28 54 0.900 0.3019 0.3066 0.8341 0.8471
2004-05 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 64 21 20 41 0.641 0.2149 0.2080 0.5937 0.5746
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 35 10 11 21 0.600
2007-08 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 34 12 27 39 1.147
2006-07 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 32 11 18 29 0.906
2005-06 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 30 3 7 10 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2005-06 · Princeton
+57.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21358
Forward overall
#672
Forward born in 1985
#535
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Sumi
Elmira · 2011-12
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Bohn
St. Mary's · 2004-05
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Murphy
Babson · 2021-22
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.