IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Rexine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0770 0.0879 0.2686 0.3067
2020-21 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 54 17 44 61 1.130 0.4013 0.4012 1.1915 1.1911
2022-23 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 62 13 22 35 0.565 0.3330 0.3020 1.6900 1.5327
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC GR 13 0 2 2 0.154
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 33 5 10 15 0.455
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 31 2 2 4 0.129
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2023-24 · Colgate
-55.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9755
Forward overall
#465
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gage Dill
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.