IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Brummitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-04-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 25 3 5 8 0.320 0.0820 0.0848 0.2372 0.2453
2005-06 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 50 11 31 42 0.840 0.2152 0.2124 0.6225 0.6144
2006-07 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 58 23 22 45 0.776 0.2602 0.2403 0.7191 0.6642
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Marian D3 NCHA — 26 4 22 26 1.000
2009-10 Marian D3 — — 27 6 17 23 0.852
2008-09 Utica D3 — — 6 0 3 3 0.500
2007-08 Utica D3 — — 15 3 1 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2007-08 · Utica
+36.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25053
Forward overall
#826
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Trathen
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Redmon
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.