| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Calgary Royals | AJHL | 60 | 10 | 17 | 27 | 0.450 | 0.1509 | 0.1565 | 0.4171 | 0.4325 |
| 2008-09 | Calgary Royals | AJHL | 58 | 8 | 30 | 38 | 0.655 | 0.2198 | 0.2188 | 0.6072 | 0.6043 |
| 2009-10 | Calgary Royals | AJHL | 56 | 21 | 31 | 52 | 0.929 | 0.3115 | 0.2941 | 0.8606 | 0.8125 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | SR | 28 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 1.036 |
| 2012-13 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | JR | 28 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 1.000 |
| 2011-12 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | SO | 27 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 0.741 |
| 2010-11 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | FR | 18 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.222 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.